Aristotle Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 1

Aristotle - Research Paper ExampleHowever, others have agreed with both theories stating that nature provides the individuals with these traits while nurture serves to mould and develop these traits through maturity and learning. The submit of heredity and the environment is however evident as in many individuals. The genetic make of an individual is derived from his p arnts and this is due to heredity. This has a lot of influence on the behavior of an individual as these traits have been reported by researchers to influence intelligence, personality, sexual orientation and aggression (Ceci & Williams, 123). These traits are encoded in an individuals desoxyribonucleic acid and hence are inherited by the offsprings. Physical appearances of various individuals like color of the skin, eye, and height among other things have confirmed this and hence in that location is a possibility that nature plays a very important role in influencing the way we behave. For example if fraternal twins that are reared under the identical conditions bequeath never behave the same way as they posses different traits from their parents. Nurture on the other hand is also very important in determining our behaviors as these traits are just in the body but they have to be developed in order to fully come up and influence the behavior of an individual. ... This is only possible when such individuals practice how to be intelligent and creative and the type of the environment in which they are also contributes a lot. It is said then he was nurtured by certain people (Ceci & Williams, 134). An example here is to consider identical twins brought up under different conditions will never behave like each other. The persistent of nature vs. nurture debate has continued long time for several centuries due to certain central fall outs. One of the most important characteristics of this issue is that there are several issues that are knitted together by ambiguity and also uncertainty into an i ssue that is very difficult to solve (Ceci & Williams, 147). This makes the people in the debate unable to put their focus in one or a single delineate meaningful question. Another issue rises from genetic language itself we need to differentiate the meaning of nature and nurture and what most scientists call contributions of the two terms. Sometimes the dispute is that nature is about what is inside while nurture is what we acquire from the environments that we interact with. Contributions here means that the impact of either nature or nurture on the behaviors of individuals. The controversy here is that some people believe that what is inborn contribute or determines what an individual will be. Nature bases its demarcation from the genes while nurture channel is based on environment (Ceci & Williams 137). There is need therefore two define very well the meaning of gene and environment as they are the key issues in this argument. We need to understand what the gene does and wha t the environment does as far as behavior is concerned. These two issues are the central of this debate. Aristotles argument in the